ALN 84.327S - Stepping Up Technology Implementation FY 23

ALN 84.327S - Stepping Up Technology Implementation FY 23

Show Video

welcome to the information session for  interested applicants for the 2023 stepping   up technology implementation Grant competition  funded by the office of the special education   programs in the office of special education and  rehabilitative services at the U.S Department of   Education I am Anita Vermeer a Project Officer  at OSEP and the manager for this competition   this competition has been assigned  assistance listing number 84.327 s I would like to go over some caveats before  diving into this webinar first the intent of   this presentation is to provide guidance only  and the information contained in this webinar   provides a general summary of the information  contained in the notice inviting applications   and the application package therefore it is  imperative that all prospective applicants   read the entire notice application package  and any additional relevant information such   as newly updated common instructions for  applications published on December 7 2022   in addition applicants are encouraged  to listen to a more General webinar   entitled Applying for Office of Special  Education Programs Discretionary Grants   for an orientation to the overall process that  webinar can be found at OSEP ideas.work.org today I will cover the following areas the  purpose of the osep technology program key   terms absolute priority and purpose application  requirements additional pertinent information   General requirements and selection criteria   the education technology media and materials  program is otherwise known as E-Tech M2   the purpose of the osep technology program  is to improve results for children with   disabilities by these four outcomes promoting the  development, demonstration and use of Technology   supporting educational activities designed to be  of educational value in the classroom providing   support for captioning and video description  that is appropriate for use in the classroom   and providing accessible educational materials  to children with disabilities in a timely manner there are a few terms for this priority that I  would like to highlight the first is promising   evidence that means that there is evidence of  the effectiveness of a key project component   in improving a relevant outcome based on a  relevant finding from one of the following   A) practice guide prepared by what works  Clearinghouse reporting a strong evidence-based   or moderate evidence base for this corresponding  practice recommendation B) an intervention report   prepared by the wwc reporting a positive effect or  potential positive effect on relevant outcome with   no reporting of a negative effect or a potentially  negative effect on a single relevant outcome   or C) a single study assessed by the department  as appropriate that is an experimental study a   quasi-experimental design study or a well-designed  and well-implemented correlational study with   statistical controls for selection bias for  example a study using regressional regression   model methods to account for differences between  a treatment group and a comparison group and it   includes at least one statistically significant  and positive effect on a relevant outcome   for definitions of promising evidence experimental  study moderate evidence quasi-experimental design   study relevant outcome and strong evidence  you can check the CFR 77.1 please note there   is an Evidence of Effectiveness form that  must be completed in with your application another term is settings settings includes  pre-kindergarten elementary middle or High   School instructional settings including classrooms  and remote learning environments applicants May   propose to support Educators who serve ELs in a  single grade or in a specific range of grades or   ages for example Pre-K or grades one through three  grades four through six middle or High School   the use of terms site reference refers to a  public school building or an early childhood   education program as defined Under The  Higher Education Act within the local   educational agencies where the applicant proposes  to implement the technology-based tool or approach Please be aware this application timelines it  was registered in the it was published in the   Federal Register on December 20th 2022 but all  applications are due by March 6 2023 before 11   59 in 59 seconds in the evening eastern  time we highly advise not to wait to the   last date to submit your application to avoid  possible technical difficulties on either end for the fiscal year of 2023 we plan to support  one absolute priority which is titled supporting   Early Childhood or K-12 Educators to deliver  literacy instruction based on the science of   reading to English Learners or as we call ELs in  this document and on the application or at risk   for children with disabilities OSEP intends  to fund three successful application three   successful applications a Cooperative agreement is  similar to a grant that its principal purpose is   to accomplish a public purpose of support or  stimulation as authorized by federal statute   it differs from a grant in the sense that a  Cooperative agreement has substantial involvement   that is anticipated between the Department of  Education and the recipient for the project period   we will award an additional three points to an  application that meets a competitive preference   priority to earn these points an applicant  must demonstrate that they have not had an   active discretionary Grant under the 84.327  S program from which it seeks funds including   through membership in a group application  which was submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75-129 within the last five years before  

the deadline date of submission for  the applications under this program   note for the purpose of this priority a grant or  contract is active until the end of the grantees   or contracts project or project or funding  period and this includes any extensions   of those periods that extend the grantees  or contractors authority to obligate funds   the applicants should indicate in the abstract  if the competitive preference priority is   addressed and must address the competitive  preference priority in the narrative section for this priority applicants must demonstrate  how they will establish and operate projects   that achieve at minimum these six outcomes  improved literacy instruction based on the   science of reading for ELs with and at risk  for Disabilities through proven strategies   that effectively integrate an existing  accessible technology-based tool or approach   that is based on at least promising evidence as  mentioned earlier promising evidence is defined   in footnote 3 on page B6 of the application  package. Increased Educators use and knowledge   of technology to deliver effective literacy  instruction based on the science of reading   for ELs with or at risk for Disabilities  through professional learning and coaching the third outcome is to increase educator  collaboration and professional learning   opportunities to use technology to  improve literacy outcomes of ELs   with and at risk for Disabilities  and to engage families to support   their child's learning in the classroom  and at home the fourth one is improved   engagement and literacy instruction and  self-regulated learning opportunities   leading to improved reading achievement  for ELs with and at risk for disabilities the next one is improved alignment of  Technology enhanced instruction with   existing curricula, state standards, and school  initiatives an improved parent family teacher   Partnerships to use technology in improving  literacy outcomes for ELs by using effective   engagement strategies such as recognizing  multilingualism and multiculturalism as an asset applicants must also describe how they will  build Partnerships with Early Childhood   programs or local educational agencies  to support Educators in the understanding   use and delivery of a technology-based tool or  approach to deliver literacy instruction based   on the science of reading for ELs with and  at-risk for disabilities in pre-kindergarten   elementary middle or High School instructional  settings we must also increase the capacity of   Educators to effectively use and deliver  a high technology-based tool or approach   that supports literacy development for ELs  with and at risk for disabilities in pre-k   elementary middle or High School instructional  settings for instruction and professional growth   technology-based tool or approach refers to  the technology the applicant is proposing   that is supported at minimum by promising  evidence with the population intended   note that applicants who may propose to support  Educators who serve ELs in a single grade or   specific range of grades or ages such as Pre-K  grades K13 grades four six middle or High School applicants must also describe how they  will develop an implementation package   of accessible products and resources that will  help Educators and families to effectively use   a technology-based tool or approach to  improve literacy outcomes and evaluate   whether the technology-based tool or approach  meets the project schools and targeted outcomes now in this section I'm going  to cover the application and   administrative requirements for the  significant section in the narrative in addition to the programming requirements it is  to be considered for funding under this priority   applicants must meet the application  and administrative requirements under   significance and they are address the need for  a technology-based tool or approach and identify   specific gaps and challenges infrastructure or  opportunities to support Educators development   to meet this requirement the applicant must  identify a fully developed tech-based tool or   approach that is based on at least promising  evidence and please note that throughout the   rest of this presentation I'm going to refer to  technology-based Tool or approach as technology   they must identify how the technology  will improve Educators pedagogy and their   capacity to deliver literacy instruction  based on the science of reading for ELs   with and at risk for disabilities  in pre-k elementary middle or High   School instructional settings including  classrooms or remote learning environments applicants must also present applicable data  at the national state Regional or local level   demonstrating the need for identified technology  tools or approaches to support ELs with and at   risk for Disabilities in Pre-K elementary middle  or High School instructional settings including   classrooms or remote learning environments and  they also must identify current policies and   procedures and practices used by Educators that  effectively incorporate technology-based tools   or approaches to support literacy outcomes  for ELs with and at risk for disabilities they also must show in the significant section  how they're able to identify systematic barriers   gaps or challenges including challenges to using  the identified technology describe the potential   impact of the identified technology and how its  approached with Educators families and ELs and   at risk for students with disabilities  in the next section I'm going to cover   the quality of project Services section in  the narrative these are the requirements   proposed project will need to demonstrate how  they will ensure equal access and treatment for   members of groups that have traditionally been  underrepresented based on race color national   origin gender age or disability to meet this  requirement they must identify the needs of the   intended recipients for ongoing professional  learning and coaching supports they need to   ensure that products and resources meet the  needs of the intended recipients of the grant and the quality they also in this quality  of project Services section they need to   achieve its goals objectives and intended  outcomes and describe how they're going   to meet this requirement by providing  measurable intended project outcomes  , they need to be based on current research by  describing how they're going to align the research   policies and practices related to the benefits  services or opportunities that are available with   their technology to describe how the proposed  project also will incorporate current   current and evidence-based research and practices  to guide the development and delivery of its   products and resources including assessability  and usability and they also need to document   that the technology used by the project is fully  developed and has been tested and shows has been   shown to have promising evidence and addresses  at least the minimum of following principles of   udl and the principles of Universal Design  for Learning are included on this next slide   multiple means of presentation so that  information can be delivered in more than one way   means things like specialized software websites  screen readers and so on also multiple means of   expression are things that allow knowledge to be  exhibited through multiple options such as writing   or concept mapping or speech to text programs  multiple means of Engagement or is to stimulate   interest in and motivation for learning such as  individual or group learning or learner choice   applicants must demonstrate in the project  Services section how they will develop new   products and resources that are high quality and  sufficient intensity and duration to achieve the   intended outcomes of the proposed project to  meet this requirement they must provide a plan   for recruiting and selecting sites with at least  10 percent concentration of ELs and were ELs with   and at risk for Disabilities are served and this  must include three development sites, four pilot   sites, and 10 dissemination sites there are details  within the notice of inviting applications on all   of these site requirements please read this  information carefully as it's not included in   this presentation the proposed project must also  provide a description of the expected student   demographics and other pertinent data whether  schools such as whether schools are identified   for comprehensive targeted support and improvement  with the elementary and secondary Education Act in the project Services section applicants  must also provide a plan for dissemination   which must address how the project will  systematically distribute distribute information   products and services to varied intended  audiences using a variety of dissemination   strategies to promote awareness and use of  the Project's products and resources that goes   beyond conference presentations and research  articles they need to provide a plan for how   the project will sustain project activities that  go beyond conference presentations and research   articles after funding ends and they need to  provide assurances that the final products   disseminated to help sites effectively implement  the technology-based tooler approach will be   both open educational resources and licensed  through an Open Access licensing Authority this section I'm going to cover the requirements  for the quality of project evaluation section in the narrative section of the application under  the quality of project evaluation projects should   include an evaluation plan as described in  these following paragraphs it must measure   progress and implementation including criteria  for determining the extent to which the products   to which the projects' products and resources  have met the goals for reaching the Project's   Target population measures of intended  outcomes or results of the Project's   activities to evaluate those activities and  how the project will assess whether the goals   or objectives of the proposed project as  described in its logic model have been met in designing the evaluation plan the application  must also provide a logic model or conceptual   framework that depicts at a minimum the  goals activities project evaluation methods   performance measures outputs and outcomes of  a proposed project provide a plan to implement   the activities described in this priority  and a plan that links the Project's logic   model or conceptual framework for a formative  evaluation of the proposed projects activities   the plan must describe how the formative  evaluation will use Clear performance objectives   to ensure continuous Improvement in the operation  of the proposed project including objective   measures of progress in implementing the project  and ensuring the quality of products and resources within the evaluation plan the applicant must  also describe a plan for method for assessing   the development and pilot sites current educator  training use and needs and any current technology   Investments and the knowledge and availability of  dedicated on-site technology training personnel   the Readiness of development and pilot sites  to Pilot or try out the technology-based tool   or approach including a minimum the current  infrastructure available resources and ability   to build capacity whether the technology tool  or approach has achieved its intended outcomes   for pre-k elementary middle or High School  Educators families and EL students with and at   risk for and the ongoing professional learning  needs of Educators to implement with fidelity evaluation activities must also include the  collection of formative and summative data   from the professional learning to refine and  evaluate the products and the applicant should   describe if the project is extended to a fifth  year that they will provide an implementation   patch package of products and resources  developed for the technology to no less   than 10 additional School sites in year five and  that they will collect summative data about the   success of the projects products and resources  and supporting implementation of the technology by the end of the project period evaluation  activities must provide information on the   products resources as supported by project  evaluation including accessibility features   that will enable other sites to implement and  sustain this implementation of the technology   information in the Project's final performance  report including implementation data on how   intended users such as Educators families  and students use the technology or how it   was implemented with Fidelity how it  was effective with the technology and   improving reading outcomes for ELs data  on how technology practices had changed   and also a plan for disseminating or scaling up  the technology tool or approach and accompanying   projects accompanying products beyond the  sites directly involved in the project this section will go over the adequacy of  resources and quality of project personnel   the applicant must demonstrate in the in this  section how it will encourage applicants from   for employment from persons who are members  of groups that have been traditionally   underrepresented such as race color origin  gender age disability and also their key project   Personnel consultants and subcontractors how  they subcontractors how they have qualifications   and experiences to carry out the proposed  activities and achieve the intended outcomes   the applicant should also list key partners and  have adequate resources to carry out the proposed   activities and that the costs are reasonable in  relation to the anticipated results and benefits the next section is the  quality of the management plan in this section the proposed management plan  should ensure that the Project's intended   outcomes will be achieved on time and within  budget to address this requirement they need   to describe clearly defined responsibilities  for key project personnel um for consultants   and subcontractors as applicable in timelines and  milestones for accomplishing this project tasks   key project personnel and any consultants and  subcontractors will be allocated and how   these allocations are appropriate and adequate  to achieve the Project's intended outcomes the applicant must demonstrate how the  proposed management plan will ensure that   the products and resources provided are  high quality relevant and useful to the   recipients the proposed project will benefit  from A diversity of perspectives including   those of families Educators researchers policy  makers and others in their development operation there are additional application requirements  included in your notice in appendix a you can   put your personnel loading charts timelines  applicable to illustrate the management plan   you can also include your logic model or  conceptual framework by which the proposed   project will demonstrate project plans and  activities to achieve the intended outcomes   also in the budget section please make sure that  you've included attendance at the following a one   and a one-half day kickoff meeting in DC also a  two and one half day project directors conference   in DC to annual two-day trips um that may be in  other locations Beyond DC and a one-day intensive   virtual or in Virtual OSEP review during the  second uh half of the second year in your project   these details for these budget include  things to include your budget is in your NIA the secretary May extend the project one  year beyond the initial 48 months to work   on dissemination scale-up sites if the grantee is  substantially achieving the intended outcomes of   the project and making a positive contribution to  the implementation of a technology-based tool or   approach in the development and pilot sites each  applicant must include in its application a plan   for the full 60-month period in deciding whether  to continue funding the project for the fifth year   the secretary will consider these requirements  by having a review team who has experience in   knowledge and Technology implementation for  personnel serving children with disabilities   she'll also the secretary will also consider  timeliness with which how well the requirements   of the negotiated Cooperative agreement  have been or are being met by the project   and the degree to which the Project's  activities have changed practices and   improve literacy outcomes for educators  and ELs with and at risk for disabilities two general requirements is that applicants must  make positive efforts to employ an advanced in   employment qualified individuals with  disabilities and project activities   and they must involve individuals with  disabilities or parents with individuals   with disabilities ages birth through 26 in  planning implementing and evaluating projects so who is eligible for this competition? the  following entities are considered eligible   under this competition SEAs, LEAs including  public charter schools operated as LEAs   under state law IHEs other public agencies private  non-profit organizations freely Associated States   and outlying areas Indian tribes or tribal  organizations and for-profit organizations here are some additional information regarding  this award the estimated range is 450   000 to 500 000 per year the maximum award  will not exceed two million five hundred   thousand for the 60 month project period and  we estimate funding three successful applicants   the initial project period is 48 months with  the possible extension of the fifth year up   to 60 months so applicants must provide  a budget for all five years of 60 months for formatting and Page limitation limit  recommendations uh is encouraged that you   check the notice of inviting applications  in the package for all of the details a   page of eight and a half by Eleven on  one side with one inch margins is the   expectation and double space all text in the  application narrative which includes titles   headings footnotes quotations citations  captions charts tables figures graphs and   screenshots use a font that's 12 point or  larger Times New Roman courier, courier new or   Arial are recommended and we recommend that the  application narrative is no more than 50 pages as part of the process in making the funding  recommendations external reviewers will judge   the quality of the application using  the five selection criteria for each   section of the narrative each application can  receive up to a total of a hundred points with   significance and quality of project service  with significance and quality of management   plan being 15 points each quality of project  Services being 30 points quality of project   evaluation and adequacy of resources and  quality of project Personnel are 20 points if you have any questions please don't reach  hesitate to reach out I can be reached at 202-987-0155 or email is anita.vermeer @ed.gov and  all the information is at grants.gov where they   have an email support that is s-u-p-p-o-r-t  at grants.gov and their phone number is 1-800-518-4726 there is also a grants.gov  training that is available on the website  

so please don't hesitate to reach out if  you have questions about the priority or   the grants one of us will be able to help you and  I recommend that you visit www.ed.gov slash oser slash osep   for more information and you may follow us on  our Blog Twitter or YouTube thank you very much

2023-01-24 17:44

Show Video

Other news